I think we gain consistency - if we always use builder, then it makes it easy to see how to write tests. It is also safer for naming, to avoid collision with possible test data in the system generated by humans (CCCCCCC is something we could add for testing, and suddenly your tests are failing) If there are fields you expect to be empty when building, we have sub _gen_default_values and should add more cases as needed 'CCCC...' is a pattern for String::Random, so the risk of collision is minimal (and the same as with TestBuilder I think ?). I agree with the consistency point, but I really don't like that TestBuilder is
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32980 --- Comment #18 from Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com> --- (In reply to Nick Clemens from comment #17) populating columns I don't want to populate. I'll see if I can make this behaviour configurable (in another bug report) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.