http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9322 --- Comment #13 from Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #12)
I don't personally like either of these approaches - I think only the transfer being completed should be completed - if it's for a reserve, it should only cancel the reserve transfer.
I was thinking maybe stash the reserve number in the comment or create a new field for "what kind of transfer it is (reserve, with a number, or branchtransfer, with branchtransfer.)"
I think adding the reserve number to the transfer record would be useful, although I prefer doing it as a real, nullable foreign key rather than sticking it in the comments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.