4 Dec
2015
4 Dec
'15
9:10 a.m.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10662 --- Comment #57 from Viktor Sarge <viktor.sarge@regionhalland.se> ---
It should be trivial to merge the 001 and 003 together to form a 035 like "(OCoLC)814782" (http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd035.html). That would certainly help eliminate that risk of "false matching" mentioned above.
However, in the LIBRIS data that I've seen, I haven't seen any examples of a 003.
Interesting. I've actually perceived it the other way around - that Libris is actually quite good at sticking "SE-LIBR" into 003 of all their records. (A quick example http://libris.kb.se/bib/14862617?vw=full&tab3=marc) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.