https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41535 --- Comment #4 from Arthur Suzuki <arthur.suzuki@biblibre.com> --- (In reply to Mathieu Saby from comment #2)
Shouldn't the symmetrical relationship of 464 be 463? I get this impression when reading https://www.transition-bibliographique.fr/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ B463_fre.pdf and https://www.transition-bibliographique.fr/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ B464_fre.pdf
that's a good point, about the marc fields, as soon as the parent record is the highest level parent record it can be 462. I don't think we use multiple level of bundles in Koha so, 462 seems fine to me.
Question may be off topic (and I suppose also applies to MARC21): all these fields can exist independently of Koha's "bundle" function. They may be present in records imported from Sudoc, BNF or other sources. Is Koha able to differentiate between and handle the two cases differently (links created in Koha <> links inherited from a source record)?
About this, Koha bundle feature will creates or remove 46x with item and biblionumber (see other bugs in the dependency tree). As thoses are specificaly Koha's identifiers, I don't think other links from other sources would be impacted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.