http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9755 --- Comment #15 from Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz> --- (In reply to comment #14)
OK, I thought it was in 090a, like in UNIMARC. So, if it useful NOT to merge 999 for Marc21, maybe it will be usefull NOT t to merge 090 too, for UNIMARC?
But 999 could also be used for other purpose I suppose, in Marc21 and in UNIMARC. For example, in UNIMARC, Academic libraries can use this subfield freely, for their own use. "Cette zone peut être utilisée librement pour des données ne correspondant à aucune zone du format d'échange standard, suivant les besoins de chaque bibliothèque." http://documentation.abes.fr/sudoc/formats/loc/zones/999. htm#UtilisationActuelle
M. Saby
It could but that would be dangerous of them, because 999 is used for Koha specific data, and merging them makes no sense, you cant have a record that has 2 biblionumbers that would break things badly. Maybe you could send a follow up patch that doesn't exclude 999 if the flavour is UNIMARC. This is still a major improvement though, and makes it much less likely for the merge to create an invalid record. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.