25 Jun
2015
25 Jun
'15
9:20 a.m.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14370 --- Comment #9 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> --- (In reply to Joy Nelson from comment #6)
If additional values are not allowed (i.e. not functional as '1') for RESTRICTED, then it probably should not be a field that runs off an 'authorised_value' list. Either hard code it like the 942$n suppress value or allow additional values.
Agreed. I think we are close to reaching consensus about the restricted>0 approach. But we need to warn libraries that added restricted values for some reason and still expect checkouts. I would not like to add a syspref on top of that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.