http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9108 --- Comment #8 from Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com> --- (In reply to comment #7)
Yes but I don't want to introduce any regression and I think my patch is more flexible than your proposition. avoid introducing regression++, but my proposal would have resulted in replacing all code that can be replaced to be. And it will clean the code.
Like this anyone is allowed to use the format he wants.
I don't see why your patch is more flexible = my proposal is to go further with your patch, not changing it ! (if another QAer disagree, feel free to jump in) the syspref has only 3 values, and this should not change.
In the same way, the patches still submitted in BZ but not pushed will not be broken (if using one of the two formats). is there a case ?
I'm still thinking my proposal should be implemented, to avoid piling code (I know there is a lot in Koha already, not a reason to continue...) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.