https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42663 --- Comment #27 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #26)
(In reply to David Cook from comment #25)
The next step after bugs 41892 41893 41894 41897 41974 41975 ? But wouldn't it make more sense for those bug reports to depend on this one? They all would need to be updated to use the OOP version, but it just seems more logical?
In a way, it's a bit of a chicken and egg problem, but if we have Koha::Context as OOP first, then there's less double-handling and all the circular deps can be removed on separate timelines - rather than needing to be done before this one can move forward.
Because realistically all of those other bugs would need to be re-tested after the change anyway... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.