https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17511 --- Comment #24 from Johanna Räisä <johanna.raisa@koha-suomi.fi> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #23)
(In reply to Johanna Räisä from comment #21)
Do you mean putting Koha's internal link to authority linking subfield?
I'm not 100% sure what you mean, but I think so, yes.
I meant that the authid would be changed to URI and saved that instead of integer value.
We are using national metadata repository and mainly the URI in $0 subfield has a link to that. It might be a good idea that Koha would use URI in authority linking subfield also.
Yeah that sounds good to me. So you wouldn't be storing authority records in Koha?
No we won't.
We are facing problem with this $9 subfield because it is used in our national metadata repository for other things and it should not change if we are pulling data to Koha. This is why it would be nice to choose which subfield is used for the authority linking.
Hmm, how are you pulling the authority data to Koha?
We are making a plugin which fetches the authority via SRU or REST API while writing it to the field. We have already a similar approach to get vocabularies https://github.com/KohaSuomi/Koha/commit/9dec82f3c28b41946f8b301dd9200cc36e9... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.