29 May
2020
29 May
'20
12:52 p.m.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25322 --- Comment #20 from David Roberts <david.roberts@ptfs-europe.com> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #18)
Did not we want to allow "no relationship"?
I can't really think of a use case for this. Anybody acting as guarantor must have some sort of relationship with the guarantee, even if it is a non-familial relationship. Couldn't users in any case create an auth value that covers "no relationship" as an option? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.