https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32558 --- Comment #46 from Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #44)
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #43)
Could you remind me why we need this? Why don't you just run another worker? This area has not been very stable in the last releases and I am not sure we should play with more forking and introduce possible regressions when an alternative (run more workers) is already available.
I could be wrong but I think the premise of this change is that it would be more difficult to update koha-worker and koha-common.init to allow for a configurable number of workers than it would be to add more forks.
However, I agree that it would be preferable to just run more workers. Even if it's easier to fork, I don't think this patch goes about it quite the right way...
I think these are both great ideas, and there is no reason we can't have both :) That way we can choose how many workers we have for each queue, and how many parallel processes each worker can handle. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.