http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13381 --- Comment #35 from Winona Salesky <wsalesky@gmail.com> --- The order in the for-each does not determine the order of the output. Subfields are output in the order they appear in the marc record. They are in alphabetical order in the for-each, purely for convenience sake. -Winona (In reply to David Cook from comment #34)
I suppose it's way too late for this so someday I'll make a different bug but...
I think the following:
<xsl:for-each select="marc:subfield[contains('bchknps', @code)]">
Should actually be:
<xsl:for-each select="marc:subfield[contains('hbcknps', @code)]">
If you look at the LoC website (http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd245.html), you'll see that $h is always between $a and $b.
--
Ahh... interesting... in the "CONTENT DESIGNATOR HISTORY", you'll see an explanation for this:
"Prior to 1994, AACR2 cataloging rules required that the medium designator be recorded following other title information and all the title in works lacking a collective title. In Pre-1994 records, subfield $h generally follows subfield $b and even subfield $c in some cases."
However, in post-1994 records, that does not appear to be the case. If anyone has access to the AACR2*, they could verify this.
*Have to love closed standards in libraries. Terry Reese has a good post about this: http://blog.reeset.net/archives/1100
-- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.