https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36735 --- Comment #6 from Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov> --- (In reply to Nick Clemens (kidclamp) from comment #5) Thanks for the feedback!
Correct, they should all be html filters now. In the end we are building a form and submitting, so they won't be in a URL
In retrospect this was a dumb question. ^^" Fixing...
I think I understand the issue, it seems odd to have the JS asset in the script and not in the include directly? In this case, the include is only used on this page, but perhaps adding a comment to the include to specify that it needs the asset would be helpful?
Basically, yes. Thanks, just wanted another pair of eyes in case there was a better solution that I wasn't finding. Keeping this as signed-off and attaching a follow-up since both of the above are trivial changes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.