http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=4330 --- Comment #1 from Lars Wirzenius <lars@catalyst.net.nz> --- Some further thoughts on this topic. The goal: * Every source file is clearly labelled with the correct copyright ownership and license information. * "make test" or some other tool makes sure all files continue to have copyright and license information. * The RM will reject patches in the future unless they make the necessary updates to each modified file. Some thoughts: * Getting this up to date and keeping it there is generally good, in case there are ever copyright disputes. * Also good for getting Koha accepted as a package in Debian. * Chris tells me all copyright info should be possible to pull from git. This will allow extraction of who edited. With only about 100 committers, some manual work to determine copyright owner for each committer should be completely feasible, even when some people (like Chris) have worked for different companies over the years. - write a little tool to data mine git for authors and the time spans they have worked in * The exact same license statement should be used everywhere. Ideally, it would be exactly the same as in the GPL boilerplate. * Debian ftpmaster advice on this topic: - http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/12/msg00007.html - http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.