9 Jul
2015
9 Jul
'15
11:18 a.m.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14494 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #2)
Hm, I feel a bit like this builds in a secret feature - if I use 9998 it will be slow, but if I use 9999 it will be faster?
When we fixed the same thing for debarments it made more sense, as the 'ulimited' debarment uses 9999 automatically, without the user entering a date. For the patron expiry the date is defined by the library and could be anything.
As I understood the description, the feature has existed. Anyway we should call Koha::DateUtils here and not directly DateTime. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.