http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6681 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #33410|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #33427|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #30 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- Created attachment 33540 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=33540&action=edit [PASSED QA] Bug 6681: introduce XSLT scripts to remove items and links This patch adds the following sample files: - Del952.xsl - Del995.xsl - Del9LinksExcept952.xsl - Del9LinksExcept995.xsl Thay can be used on the new SRU/Z39.50 XSLT processing feature. At the same time they can be used to solve this bug. To test: - Have an SRU/Z39.50 target configured - Have a search that returns at least a record with the following properties: * It contains $9 links * It contains items (952 or 995 fields in MARC21/NORMARC and UNIMARC respectively). MARC21/NORMARC test: - Do a Z39.50/SRU cataloguing search that retrieves the desired record - Verify it includes $9 and 952 field(s) by clicking on the MARC link - Edit your Z39.50 target and add Del952.xsl to the "XSLT File(s) for transforming results:" field - Re-run the search => SUCCESS: the MARC view of the imported record doesn't contain the 952 field - Edit your Z39.50 target and add Del9LinksExcept952.xsl to the "XSLT File(s) for transforming results:" field - Re-run the search => SUCCESS: the MARC view contains the 952 field (including the $9 subfield), and all other $9 subfields have been removed - Edit your Z39.50 target and add Del952.xsl, Del9LinksExcept952.xsl to the "XSLT File(s) for transforming results:" field (both, comma separated) - Re-run the search => SUCCESS: the MARC view doesn't contain $9 subfields nor items. - Repeat for UNIMARC, replacing 952 for 995. - Sign off :-D Regards Tomas Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Cordoba Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> Tested under MARC21. Works fine. (Additionally verified 995 with xsltproc.) As noted on Bugzilla, we could still improve documentation but imo no need to block these example transformations. Signed-off-by: Frederic Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr> I can't resist to put my own signature on this patch, confirming it works as described with z39.50 Unimarc targets. Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.