24 Nov
2010
24 Nov
'10
7:05 p.m.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 --- Comment #1 from Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com> 2010-11-24 19:05:30 UTC --- A suggestion - rather than widening the field, if bibliographic fields need to be stored outside of the MARC record for display, performance, or caching reason, multiple values would be better handled by keeping them in a separate table, something like: biblio_attributes: biblionumber (foreign key) code (identifies the attribute, i.e., 'isbn', 'issn', etc.) seqno (sequence number, if needed) value -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.