https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19893 --- Comment #98 from Ere Maijala <ere.maijala@helsinki.fi> --- (In reply to David Gustafsson from comment #97)
I just realized that splitting up the fields would not make any difference with the Koha-specific implementation, it makes no distinction if subfield mappings are defined together in one mapping or separately. I would guess
True, but in my version in bug 20244 it does make a difference. What comes to the indexing of 100 etc. I can't see the problem with indexing the whole field as an entity. Since everything in it is in a single field, it's bound to be something belonging together. If, however, that turns out to be a problem, it would be way better to be able to define e.g. that 100abcde is one field and the rest is another. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.