https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25686 --- Comment #16 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #15)
This is an issue I've been pondering for years. Personally, I'd love to see the "Default Framework" be managed by Koha rather than by end users, so that we could constantly update it with the latest and greatest configuration.
I am not sure about this, we'd need to allow local changes. For example we have several custom fields agreed on for data exchange in Germany and in between libraries in certain areas.
Hmm that's a good point. Maybe we should have a "Reference" MARC Bibliographic Framework that is not the "Default", but which gets updated during upgrades. Maybe we could have a "diff tool" for showing the differences between "Reference" and any other framework, and have a user-friendly method for updating other frameworks from the "Reference" framework. The onus would still be on Koha users to update their frameworks, but at least they'd have the ability to do it in a practical (and authoritative) way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.