https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19826 --- Comment #24 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #21)
(In reply to Julian Maurice from comment #18)
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #15)
Hum, so Koha::Acquisition::Vendor::Basket::Order? :)
Please, no :) Not everything can be represented in a tree. Where do you place basket groups in this hierarchy ? It could be Koha::Acq::Vendor::Basketgroup::Basket, but not every basket belongs to a basketgroup. Also, there is a 1-n relationship between biblio and aqorders, but Koha::Biblio::Orders does not make much sense IMHO.
If there was a vote, I'd vote for everything on one level
Not everything, but I would prefer Koha::Acq::Budget[s] and Koha::Acq::fund[s] too. Setting to In Discussion to get more opinions.
I don't really care, really. I've moved Fund(s).pm one level up, and marked PQA so Matthias can code the funds endpoint on top of this. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.