https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29623 --- Comment #26 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart+koha@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #24)
I think we can probably call this one PQA now.. but I'd love to see a follow-up but to convert to Koha::Cache as we've pretty much done all the work here to make sure we're resetting the caches as required on changes and caching for longer makes sense.
Yes, maybe. However I am expecting several adjustments in test files as we are deleting all the entries from circulation_rules in some tests.
I'm also interested in David's suggestion about using ID's for the cache key, but I've not investigated the code to validate that myself.
I don't think it's possible, get_effective_rule_value does not have the ID. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.