18 Dec
2017
18 Dec
'17
12:12 p.m.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19821 --- Comment #9 from Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com> --- (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #8) > Interesting. > I'm just thinking if we should not resolve the garbage data problem instead > of working around it with another database. Sure we could, but 1) I think it cannot be fixed once and for all (patch writer could forget to setup the DB transaction in tests, when you will test the patch it will alter your database) 2) It doesn't fix the other problems (non obvious fails caused by different data, non testable "transactions-using" code) > I would rather not default to another database. Can you elaborate on why you prefer to keep only one database ? > If you create an additional clone with db and koha-conf, you can just run > another export KOHA_CONF and run a test on the other db? Right, but 1) It's error-prone (I know I will forget to change KOHA_CONF at some point) 2) If I'm the only one doing that, it only fixes my "garbage data" problem. However if everyone starts using the same database for tests, it might ease writing and running tests. It also make testing with another marcflavour very easy (maybe some day all tests will pass in UNIMARC... :)) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.