http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8559 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|In Discussion |Passed QA Assignee|koha-bugs@lists.koha-commun |kyle@bywatersolutions.com |ity.org | QA Contact|paul.poulain@biblibre.com |jonathan.druart@biblibre.co | |m --- Comment #23 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com> --- (In reply to comment #22)
Jonathan,
(In reply to comment #21)
Previous QA comments must be ignored. The warning comes from a new defined routine (and caused by the circulars dependencies).
Marked as Passed QA.
Did you QA this, or did you merely change the status to "Passed QA" because the error message Paul reported turned out to not be relevant? Your message does not make it clear whether you reviewed the patch and approved it or not.
I change the status to "Passed QA" because I thought Paul and Mason didn't because of the error message. But now I realise that perhaps I misunderstood So I just reviewed these patchs and now I really pass QA it! :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.