https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11889 --- Comment #33 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> --- (In reply to Christopher Brannon from comment #32)
I think this patch needs to focus on this topic as a whole and not as a piece. I think we can't solve all issues on one report. So we have to agree on the goal we want to reach, but do it step by step.
Perhaps what can be done is to setup a button on the list to transfer ownership. Would be a nice feature.
I think a superlibrarian should also have the ability to transfer, with the same options, but they get the ability to chose any patron to send the request to. Why exactly? The privacy discussion comes up here..
Another approach for patrons being deleted with shared lists is to have the disowned list be listed in a group of unowned shared lists. Another question arises...does a shared list have to be owned? If a list is shared or public, couldn't it remain unowned? The lists module has not really been designed that way. The option that I mentioned already a few times, is a compromize in this direction: create a fake staff user that owns all these lists; could be a pref.
-- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.