[Bug 11453] New: Update EN default UNIMARC bibliographic framework
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453 Bug ID: 11453 Summary: Update EN default UNIMARC bibliographic framework Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Bibliographic data support Assignee: gmcharlt@gmail.com Reporter: bgkriegel@gmail.com QA Contact: testopia@bugs.koha-community.org English default UNIMARC bibliographic framework need to be updated. UNIMARC manual (2008) http://archive.ifla.org/VI/8/unimarc-concise-bibliographic-format-2008.pdf Updates (2012) http://www.ifla.org/node/7974 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453 Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|gmcharlt@gmail.com |bgkriegel@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453 --- Comment #1 from Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com> --- Created attachment 23825 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=23825&action=edit Bug 11453 - Update EN default UNIMARC bibliographic framework This patch updates default EN UNIMARC bibliographic framework I used the 2008 version of the UNIMARC bibliographic manual, and added updates listed on official site. There are new fields/subfields, those added are hidden by default. There are some description changes, and also a lot of changes to repeatable and mandatory values. To test: a) Functional 1) Remove all bibliographic frameworks 2) Load new file unimarc_framework_DEFAULT.sql 3) Check that it load without errors b) Correctness 1) Take a time and verify that all new fields/subfileds are correct -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453 Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |Needs Signoff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453 mathieu saby <mathsabypro@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mathsabypro@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from mathieu saby <mathsabypro@gmail.com> --- Hello Not sure of that, but I see that you added a 852 field. We don't use it in France, but I suppose it is made for storing information about items, which are stored in 995 in UNIMARC Koha. I unterstand it is part of the IFLA standard, but don't you think this could be source of mistakes ? I'm not sure of the best way of dealing with that: maybe not creating 852 field in a fist time? or adding a comment in the fied name to prevent mistakes? And maybe on a long run, we could envision to move items from 995 to 852 ?? Mathieu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453 --- Comment #3 from Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com> --- (In reply to mathieu saby from comment #2)
Hello Hi Mathieu and thanks for taking a look
Not sure of that, but I see that you added a 852 field. We don't use it in France, but I suppose it is made for storing information about items, which are stored in 995 in UNIMARC Koha.
For what I can see UNIMARC 852 is very similar to MARC21 852 (http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/concise/bd852.html) That is not used on MARC21 Koha, we use 952 instead.
I unterstand it is part of the IFLA standard, but don't you think this could be source of mistakes ? I'm not sure of the best way of dealing with that: maybe not creating 852 field in a fist time? or adding a comment in the fied name to prevent mistakes? And maybe on a long run, we could envision to move items from 995 to 852 ??
On MARC21 framework it's hidden so is not a problem, may be the same could be done on UNIMARC. And all new fields are hidden by default. If you load the framework the only visible field is 856 Bernardo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453 Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Signoff |Signed Off -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453 Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #23825|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #4 from Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz> --- Created attachment 23882 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=23882&action=edit Bug 11453 - Update EN default UNIMARC bibliographic framework This patch updates default EN UNIMARC bibliographic framework I used the 2008 version of the UNIMARC bibliographic manual, and added updates listed on official site. There are new fields/subfields, those added are hidden by default. There are some description changes, and also a lot of changes to repeatable and mandatory values. To test: a) Functional 1) Remove all bibliographic frameworks 2) Load new file unimarc_framework_DEFAULT.sql 3) Check that it load without errors b) Correctness 1) Take a time and verify that all new fields/subfileds are correct Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Passed QA Patch complexity|--- |Medium patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #23882|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #5 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- Created attachment 24543 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=24543&action=edit [PASSED QA] Bug 11453 - Update EN default UNIMARC bibliographic framework This patch updates default EN UNIMARC bibliographic framework I used the 2008 version of the UNIMARC bibliographic manual, and added updates listed on official site. There are new fields/subfields, those added are hidden by default. There are some description changes, and also a lot of changes to repeatable and mandatory values. To test: a) Functional 1) Remove all bibliographic frameworks 2) Load new file unimarc_framework_DEFAULT.sql 3) Check that it load without errors b) Correctness 1) Take a time and verify that all new fields/subfileds are correct Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz> Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de> Huge patch, lots of additions and corrections. To view the changes git diff --color-words HEAD^ is helpful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453 Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gmcharlt@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com> --- (In reply to mathieu saby from comment #2)
Hello Not sure of that, but I see that you added a 852 field. We don't use it in France, but I suppose it is made for storing information about items, which are stored in 995 in UNIMARC Koha. I unterstand it is part of the IFLA standard, but don't you think this could be source of mistakes ? I'm not sure of the best way of dealing with that: maybe not creating 852 field in a fist time? or adding a comment in the fied name to prevent mistakes? And maybe on a long run, we could envision to move items from 995 to 852 ??
A general question I've been curious about for a while: who uses the English UNIMARC frameworks? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de --- Comment #7 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- I think the idea behind the update was in part that it could be used for translations. So only one framework would have to be updated in the future. But the question is good, maybe basing them on another, the French(?) would make more sense? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453 --- Comment #8 from mathieu saby <mathsabypro@gmail.com> --- I'm sure it's used in France, in Portugal, in Italy. And Koha is used in those 3 countries. It may also be in use in Greece, Russia, Croatia and some arabic speaking countries (I found data of 2008 for those countries). Mathieu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453 --- Comment #9 from Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com> --- (In reply to mathieu saby from comment #8)
I'm sure it's used in France, in Portugal, in Italy. And Koha is used in those 3 countries. It may also be in use in Greece, Russia, Croatia and some arabic speaking countries (I found data of 2008 for those countries).
Right -- but do they use the *English* version specifically? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453 --- Comment #10 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- If we don't update the English version, we should maybe pick another language to base the po file for translations on? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453 Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Passed QA |Pushed to Master --- Comment #11 from Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com> --- Pushed to master. Thanks, Bernardo! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |6172 CC| |dubyk@library.lviv.ua --- Comment #12 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- *** Bug 6172 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453 Fridolin SOMERS <fridolyn.somers@biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |10726 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org