http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453 --- Comment #3 from Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com> --- (In reply to mathieu saby from comment #2)
Hello Hi Mathieu and thanks for taking a look
Not sure of that, but I see that you added a 852 field. We don't use it in France, but I suppose it is made for storing information about items, which are stored in 995 in UNIMARC Koha.
For what I can see UNIMARC 852 is very similar to MARC21 852 (http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/concise/bd852.html) That is not used on MARC21 Koha, we use 952 instead.
I unterstand it is part of the IFLA standard, but don't you think this could be source of mistakes ? I'm not sure of the best way of dealing with that: maybe not creating 852 field in a fist time? or adding a comment in the fied name to prevent mistakes? And maybe on a long run, we could envision to move items from 995 to 852 ??
On MARC21 framework it's hidden so is not a problem, may be the same could be done on UNIMARC. And all new fields are hidden by default. If you load the framework the only visible field is 856 Bernardo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.