http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14239 Magnus Enger <magnus@libriotech.no> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |magnus@libriotech.no -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14239 David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcook@prosentient.com.au --- Comment #1 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- I don't know how out of date this is and I haven't been following the BIBFRAME listserv but according to the Library of Congress website: "BIBFRAME is far from an environment that you could move to yet. The model and its components are still in discussion and development -- a work in progress. When it is more mature, vendors and suppliers will need time to adjust services to accommodate it. And then we can expect a mixed environment for some time." http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/faqs/#q08 -- I see Zepheira working with LoC, SirsiDynix, and the NLM... but BIBFRAME still seems like a distant future kind of thing... even though libraries want it now because they're hearing it's the new hotness. Regarding that tool: "This XQuery version was developed by the Library of Congress Network Development and MARC Standards Office. This transformation is under development and does not at this time represent a canonical transformation of MARC Bib data to BIBFRAME resources. It is made available for evaluation and comment." https://github.com/lcnetdev/marc2bibframe I don't think XQuery will be very usable for us, but certainly something useful to watch. Might also be worth looking at https://github.com/lcnetdev/marc2bibframe-python although it doesn't look like it's been touched in years whereas the XQuery version was updated only 5 days ago. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.