https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14007 --- Comment #28 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #26)

(In reply to David Cook from comment #25)

...

I'm going to take this one over. I've got a library who wants this fixed, and I've got an idea on how to do it, so planning to do this soon.

Except that I totally misunderstood the problem...

Sure, if your OpacHiddenItem rule is an itype rule, you can filter it out of the facets.

But if your OpacHiddenItem rule is a withdrawn rule, it's not clear what facet value belongs to a hidden item. Yep. I get it now. Bit of an oversight there...

(In reply to David Cook from comment #27)

Yeah... this one might not be fixable.

So... I think I make a good point there. However, Liz said in the Description that the problem was that the Library hid item type "password" and they wanted to stop the item type "password" from showing in the facets. That's the same problem reported to me by one of my libraries. And that problem is fixable with my earlier idea of checking the facet values against the OpacHiddenItems. It's not a perfect solution for values from items hidden by OpacHiddenItems appearing in the facets... but it *does* solve the problem of values hidden by OpacHiddenItems appearing in the facets. So... I think I'll still go ahead with this fix (both locally and upstream). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.