[Bug 26117] New: itemlost_on value should be updated when item changes from one lost value to another
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26117 Bug ID: 26117 Summary: itemlost_on value should be updated when item changes from one lost value to another Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew@bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia@bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl To recreate: - set an item to lost=1 - get the itemlost_on value for your item from the database - change the item to lost=2 - get the itemlost_on value again, confirm that the time hasn't changed I'm sort of torn on this. Just now, we ran into an issue where it we needed to know when a lost value was changed. But I can also imagine a situation where one would want to know when an item became lost originally. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26117 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-c | |ommunity.org --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> --- I think the current behaviour is correct. Maybe the cataloguing logs should be used to know when the lost's value has been edited? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26117 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #1)
I think the current behaviour is correct. Maybe the cataloguing logs should be used to know when the lost's value has been edited?
+1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla-daemon@bugs.koha-community.org