https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29852 Noémie Labine <noemie.labine@collecto.ca> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |noemie.labine@collecto.ca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29852 Sarah Cornell <sbcornell@cityofportsmouth.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sbcornell@cityofportsmouth. | |com --- Comment #1 from Sarah Cornell <sbcornell@cityofportsmouth.com> --- We agree! There are URLs that always show up on our report that we know are fine, even though they returned an error in the cron job. We'd like to enter a list of prefixes that do not need checked, or do not need to be reported. Either option would achieve a shorter list to review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29852 Dani Elder <danielle.elder@law.utexas.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |danielle.elder@law.utexas.e | |du --- Comment #2 from Dani Elder <danielle.elder@law.utexas.edu> --- Adding a comment that this is still a very much desired enhancement. We have thousands of URLs for records behind a paywall and yes, we can delete those, but it takes so much time and my laptop is a poorly state laptop and strains with the size of the file. It is the other thousands or so URLs we would love to check. I get a report with about 200,000 lines, if we could exclude or skip a prefix, we would more efficiently be able to narrow this down to a few thousands, and that would be more manageable. Thanks, Dani -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.