[Bug 26116] New: Allow multiple suppression values
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26116 Bug ID: 26116 Summary: Allow multiple suppression values Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew@bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia@bugs.koha-community.org Right now, Koha will only suppress records where 942$n=1. It would be good to be able to suppress on multiple values in order to reflect a variety of reasons for suppression. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26116 Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |23406 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23406 [Bug 23406] Authorized Value for Suppression when added to Frameworks doesn't show Suppress in Staff Client -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26116 George Williams (NEKLS) <george@nekls.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |george@nekls.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26116 --- Comment #1 from George Williams (NEKLS) <george@nekls.org> --- +1 - good idea -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26116 Sarah Cornell <sbcornell@cityofportsmouth.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sbcornell@cityofportsmouth. | |com --- Comment #2 from Sarah Cornell <sbcornell@cityofportsmouth.com> --- +1! In order to make it easier for staff to assign the suppression value, I redefined 1 to "Suppressed in OPAC" but now the line "Suppressed in OPAC" doesn't display on search results or detail pages. More flexibility in defining suppression values, please! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26116 Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|23406 | Depends on| |23406 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23406 [Bug 23406] When using an authorised value for suppression, record doesn't show as suppressed in staff interface -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26116 Bug 26116 depends on bug 23406, which changed state. Bug 23406 Summary: When using an authorised value for suppression, record doesn't show as suppressed in staff interface https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23406 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Pushed to oldstable |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26116 --- Comment #3 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- Now that we fixed bug 23406, I wonder how we could make this work best. The template check could be something like: - if not empty or 0 - if value >= 1 ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26116 --- Comment #4 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Sarah Cornell from comment #2)
+1!
In order to make it easier for staff to assign the suppression value, I redefined 1 to "Suppressed in OPAC" but now the line "Suppressed in OPAC" doesn't display on search results or detail pages.
More flexibility in defining suppression values, please!
This problem was now fixed by bug 23406 - it should show now when using an authorised value that has a code of 1 and any description. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org