[Bug 38652] New: Adjust SeparateHoldings preference to create third holdings tab for branches in library group.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38652 Bug ID: 38652 Summary: Adjust SeparateHoldings preference to create third holdings tab for branches in library group. Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff interface Assignee: koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org Reporter: sspohn@oslri.net QA Contact: testopia@bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt@gmail.com This enhancement proposes to adjust the SeparateHoldings system preference and the record display in the Staff Interface (/cgi-bin/koha/catalogue/detail.pl) to make it possible, using “library_group”, to display items from multibranch members of a consortium. This adjustment would create an option third tab that would display holding from other members of a library_group. Current options for SeparateHoldings: Don’t Separate “0” Separate “1” We propose: Don’t Separate “0” Separate (2 columns) “1” Separate (3 columns) “2” Behavior: No change to Don’t Separate “0” or Separate (2 columns) “1”. IF Separate (3 columns) “2” AND IF loggedInLibrary is member of a library_group THEN alter /cgi-bin/koha/catalogue/detail.pl as follows: Display a third tab between the first “homebranch” tab and the third “all other items” tab. The new second tab should display items holdings from other members of the library_group. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38652 --- Comment #1 from Steve, OSLRI, USA <sspohn@oslri.net> --- Potential discussion item #1: Does the current library get their holdings repeated with their group? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38652 --- Comment #2 from Steve, OSLRI, USA <sspohn@oslri.net> --- Potential discussion item #2 - Should this be mirrored in the OPAC using OPACSeparateHoldings in the same way? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38652 Ocean State Libraries Watcher <bywater@oslri.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bywater@oslri.net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38652 Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew@bywatersolutions.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38652 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Adjust SeparateHoldings |Adjust SeparateHoldings |preference to create third |preference to create third |holdings tab for branches |holdings tab for libraries |in library group. |in library group --- Comment #3 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- Good questions Steve! I like the idea of this, but I am not sure what work best. Maybe another discussion item: Should we have as many tabs as we have groups with this "attribute"? So not only a third tab, but current library followed by tabs for each library group for this specific feature. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38652 --- Comment #4 from Steve, OSLRI, USA <sspohn@oslri.net> --- Is it possible for a branch to be a member of multiple groups? (Not something I've we've pondered.). If so, then you're probably right about that. (You can thank Andrew@ByWater for the Qs. He helped us to frame this bug for submission.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38652 --- Comment #5 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Steve, OSLRI, USA from comment #4)
Is it possible for a branch to be a member of multiple groups? (Not something I've we've pondered.). If so, then you're probably right about that.
(You can thank Andrew@ByWater for the Qs. He helped us to frame this bug for submission.)
Yes, libraries can be in multiple groups and they can overlap. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38652 --- Comment #6 from Steve, OSLRI, USA <sspohn@oslri.net> --- Ah, that's interesting. Then, I'd suggest a tab for each group where holdings exist AND library_groups.ft_search_groups_staff = 1 (for the Intranet) AND/or library_groups.ft-search_groups_opac = 1 (for the OPAC) There is a group for Koha consortia in the US. I'll post this there in hopes that others will weigh in on this question in case views differ. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38652 --- Comment #7 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- I was imagining it as a new "checkbox" in the group settings, so it would not need to be tied to search groups necessarily. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38652 --- Comment #8 from Steve, OSLRI, USA <sspohn@oslri.net> --- I think I see where you're going. So, IF SeparateHoldings = 1 AND library_groups.checkbox = 1 AND holdings exist THEN Display tab? ... with no need to make an adjustment to the SeparateHoldings system preference? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38652 --- Comment #9 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Steve, OSLRI, USA from comment #8)
I think I see where you're going. So,
IF SeparateHoldings = 1 AND library_groups.checkbox = 1 AND holdings exist THEN Display tab?
... with no need to make an adjustment to the SeparateHoldings system preference?
Re-phrasing to see if I read it correctly: If the pref is set and there are library groups with the "marker" for holdings tabs, use these. Otherwise just keep current behavior if pref is active. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38652 --- Comment #10 from Steve, OSLRI, USA <sspohn@oslri.net> --- Sounds like we're on the same page. Let's see what others say! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38652 --- Comment #11 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Steve, OSLRI, USA from comment #10)
Sounds like we're on the same page. Let's see what others say!
yep! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38652 Juliet Heltibridle <jheltibridle@rcplib.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jheltibridle@rcplib.org --- Comment #12 from Juliet Heltibridle <jheltibridle@rcplib.org> --- I like this idea. It would help our library see the holdings for us and our Bookmobile separate from the 11 other libraries in the consortium. And one of our libraries has a mini-branch. I could imagine them using it the same way. Additionally, I think it would be helpful to have the same functionality in the OPAC for libraries that prefer to share within a smaller group before going to the rest of the consortium. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38652 trevor.diamond@mainlib.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |trevor.diamond@mainlib.org --- Comment #13 from trevor.diamond@mainlib.org --- Glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks this way! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38652 Lisette Scheer <lisette@bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lisette@bywatersolutions.co | |m Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #14 from Lisette Scheer <lisette@bywatersolutions.com> --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 35211 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org