[Bug 11889] New: Disown a list
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11889 Bug ID: 11889 Summary: Disown a list Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Lists Assignee: gmcharlt@gmail.com Reporter: m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia@bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11889 M. de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |http://bugs.koha-community. | |org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi? | |id=9032 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11889 --- Comment #1 from M. de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> --- Please see bug 9032 also. One of the last patches on that report made Koha behavior consistent when deleting a list or deleting a patron. But what if we would like to keep public lists or shared lists when deleting a patron that owned these lists? We could add a syspref that controlled this. If enabled, we could allow owner NULL for public and shared lists if the patron is deleted, or if the patron deletes one of those lists. (Instead of the NULL value, we could also move them to a designated patron for this purpose.) In the attachment some code that shows what should go into HandleDelBorrower. Similar changes should be made to DelShelf. What do you think? Is this a welcome feature or is it confusing and should we just delete these lists? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11889 --- Comment #2 from M. de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> --- Created attachment 25972 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=25972&action=edit Example code -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11889 M. de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|gmcharlt@gmail.com |m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11889 kholt@roseville.ca.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kholt@roseville.ca.us -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11889 Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |http://bugs.koha-community. | |org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi? | |id=13417 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11889 Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cbrannon@cdalibrary.org --- Comment #3 from Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org> --- (In reply to M. de Rooy from comment #1)
Please see bug 9032 also. One of the last patches on that report made Koha behavior consistent when deleting a list or deleting a patron. But what if we would like to keep public lists or shared lists when deleting a patron that owned these lists?
We could add a syspref that controlled this. If enabled, we could allow owner NULL for public and shared lists if the patron is deleted, or if the patron deletes one of those lists. (Instead of the NULL value, we could also move them to a designated patron for this purpose.)
In the attachment some code that shows what should go into HandleDelBorrower. Similar changes should be made to DelShelf.
What do you think? Is this a welcome feature or is it confusing and should we just delete these lists?
Lists should not just automatically be deleted. It should be a preference. Some public lists created by a former staff account, for example. Christopher -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11889 --- Comment #4 from kholt@roseville.ca.us --- It would be great to be able to keep public lists. We had this problem when the staff person who maintained our Newbery Awards list retired and her staff account was deleted. A system administrator should be able to transfer ownership of a list so that it can continue to be added to. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org