http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9701 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|unspecified |master See Also| |http://bugs.koha-community. | |org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi? | |id=8380, | |http://bugs.koha-community. | |org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi? | |id=2280 CC| |katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9701 Eugene Espinoza <eugenegf@yahoo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eugenegf@yahoo.com --- Comment #1 from Eugene Espinoza <eugenegf@yahoo.com> --- Not only in the first indicator but also in the second indicator, if the system can let the users put default values in the indicators. This can addressed either: 1) In edit field of the MARC Bibliographic framework, there should be another option for the first indicator and second indicator, or 2) In the subfields where a particular subfield affects the indicators (e.g. When 650$2 is filled up, then the indicator should be 7). In no. 2, there should probably be a mechanism of "if and then" much like the MARC modification template we already have in Koha. No. 2 is kind of difficult to implement unlike 1, where you outright assign the indicators. But no. 1 has some problems too, like assigning indicators that are based on the number of characters (e.g. in 245 indicator 2). These are just my thoughts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.