At 06:05 PM 2/19/2015 -0700, Jesse wrote:
The shortened doctype looks odd, but is the new official recommendation for HTML 5. Koha has changed to this for the OPAC and (I believe the staff side).
Yup, but I tried that (explicitly declaring HTML5) and it throws up dozens of errors (50+ of them yui css) and hundreds of warnings. Putting it back to XHTML substantially decreases the list. Best -- Paul
2015-02-19 17:59 GMT-07:00 Paul A <<mailto:paul.a@navalmarinearchive.com>paul.a@navalmarinearchive.com>: doc-head-open.inc in 3.08 started by adding:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" Â Â "<http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd>http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
3.18 just adds <!DOCTYPE html> -- which gives rise to "errors" in most verification processes (W3C etc). Was there a reason to change this? (Can't find anything in bugs.)
I'm playing with the Google mod_pagespeed in Apache 2.4, and adding the full DOCTYPE seems necessary. I haven't (yet) seen a downside to adding it back in.
Best -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list <mailto:Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org>Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : <http://www.koha-community.org/>http://www.koha-community.org/ git : <http://git.koha-community.org/>http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : <http://bugs.koha-community.org/>http://bugs.koha-community.org/
-- Jesse Weaver
--- Maritime heritage and history, preservation and conservation, research and education through the written word and the arts. <http://NavalMarineArchive.com> and <http://UltraMarine.ca>