Am 28.05.12 16:48, schrieb Paul Poulain:
Hello koha-devel,
I just pushed a follow-up for bug 6858. If you look at the patch, you'll see that the author is from BibLibre, as well as the sign-offer. But if you look more carefully on the patch comments, you may understand that Stephane Delaye has signed-off "in the name of the library". We're facing here a case where the library don't want/can't sign-off their patch (they don't know how to do it and don't want to bother with doing it. They just said this patch worked for them)
At BibLibre, we have 3 project managers: Stéphane Delaye / Gaetan Boisson / François Charbonnier. They are librarians and are doing the glue between the library our customer and our developers. they know how to sign-off a patch.
I want, in this mail, request that those 3 ppl from BibLibre (and only them) can be sign-offers for patches written by another BibLibre developer, once the library has confirmed it works.
I propose that we define a standard message, something like Signed-off-by: Delaye Stephane <stephane.delaye@biblibre.com> patch validated by <LIBRARY NAME>, signed-off in their name
Can I have your agreement with this idea ?
I have absolutely no problem with this. To me it sounds like "signed of by stephane delaye of biblibre, on behalf of <LIBRARY NAME>", which is a perfectly fine proxy situation.
(of course, in case another support provider has the same kind of situation, this would also be applicable. It's not something I want for BibLibre only)
- Marc