Hi, On Feb 21, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Colin Campbell wrote:
Why not just invoices, I think the prefixes are superfluous ( orders invoices etc are relevant objects outside of acquisition, serials uses them for instance and we dont need to distinguish them from some other type of order ) But just because we've done one more sensibly we dont need to bring the rest into line, I'm perfectly willing to continue cursing at that aq prefix (my fingers want to type acq) and we can postpone 'the great renaming' until we get around to something that requires the interface to the orders table to be updated.
I agree with Colin -- why not just call it 'invoices' and start dropping the prefix? Furthermore, doing that is a way to get the renaming started. However, ultimately I think it matters more that work proceed on adding invoice functionality rather than getting too hung up on the 'aq' prefix. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton Director of Support and Implementation Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts email: gmc@esilibrary.com direct: +1 770-709-5581 cell: +1 404-984-4366 skype: gmcharlt web: http://www.esilibrary.com/ Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org & http://evergreen-ils.org