I was not aware of that. I have no strong opinion on the matter in general, but I will say that with this style of versioning at least we wouldn't have to argue over what constitutes and justifies a major revision number change ; ) Kyle http://www.kylehall.info ByWater Solutions ( http://bywatersolutions.com ) Meadville Public Library ( http://www.meadvillelibrary.org ) Crawford County Federated Library System ( http://www.ccfls.org ) Mill Run Technology Solutions ( http://millruntech.com ) On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:45 AM, MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop> wrote:
I think if were to ditch the traditional versioning system, that maybe
Kyle wrote: the
Ubuntu year/month style would. So a major release this month would be version 13.04. I'm not endorsing it, it's just a possibility ; )
If we go that way, please don't use the point as the divider because having soooo many skipped numbers is a source of confusion with Ubuntu and similar. At least Linux's "odd second numbers are for odd developers, even second numbers to keep on an even keel" has some explanation.
So please use 13-04 or 13/04 (or 2013-04 to make dating really clear?) for this possibility.
Thanks, -- MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. http://koha-community.org supporter, web and library systems developer. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire (including development) at http://www.software.coop/ _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/