Hi to all, reading the indexes defintions, etc/zebradb/marc_defs/marc21/biblios/record.abs etc/zebradb/marc_defs/unimarc/biblios/record.abs I have understand that Unimarc and MARC21 have different indexes on holding data. But in fact Koha templates are only one, so we probably use the same indexes with different source. The situation [reading files from maintenance tree]: In common IndexName Unimarc MARC21 barcode 995$f 952$p holdingbranch 995$c,995$d 952$b homebranch 995$a, 995$b 952$a Local-classification 995$k 952$o Local-Number 090$9 999$c location 995$e 952$c lost 995$2 952$1 Note 995$u 952$z onloan 995$n 952$q Only Unimarc item 995 date-entered-on-file 099$c Date/time-last-modified 099$d Host-item 995$a, 995$b LC-card-number 995$j Call-Number 995$k lcn 995$k popularity 995$s Only MARC21 totalissues 942$0 cn-bib-source 942$2 cn-bib-sort 942$6 itemtype 942$c cn-class 942$h cn-item 942$i cn-prefix 942$k cn-suffix 942$m Suppress 942$n withdrawn 952$0 classification-source 952$2 materials-specified 952$3 damaged 952$4 restricted 952$5 cn-sort 952$6 notforloan 952$7 ccode 952$8 itemnumber 952$9 Date-of-acquisition 952$d acqsource 952$e coded-location-qualifier 952$f price 952$g stack 952$j issues 952$l renewals 952$m reserves 952$n datelastseen 952$r datelastborrowed 952$s copynumber 952$t uri 952$u replacementprice 952$v replacementpricedate 952$w itype 952$y biblioitemnumber 999$d Question: Why so many indexes only for one type of MARC (Unimarc or MARC21)? Do we need to coordinate more indexes ? There is a simple way to know which indexes on local / holdings are used in the koha template ? Bye to all Zeno Tajoli Zeno Tajoli CILEA - Segrate (MI) tajoliAT_SPAM_no_prendiATcilea.it (Indirizzo mascherato anti-spam; sostituisci quanto tra AT con @)