10 Feb
2012
10 Feb
'12
2:09 p.m.
Le 10/02/2012 14:24, Owen Leonard a écrit : >> For a long time now, the bar of involvement has been if you really are that keen to change things, >> show up at the General Meeting. > > I think this is a valid point. The meeting agendas are posted well in > advance, so it should be possible to arrange to be present for a vote. Well, with time shifting, don't expect ppl from the "it's 2AM" timezone to be here, so I strongly think we should adress this issue. > We've already demonstrated that for larger issues (like the Koha > non-profit question) we can use alternate methods to vote. I say we > should keep the smaller stuff (especially developer-centric stuff) to > the IRC meetings. So maybe we should say: * discussion votes are made on the mailing list / on the wiki, and not on IRC if you think we should not have 2 places to vote ? Note that i've nothing against more than one method to vote. In France, if you're not present the day of the vote, you can do a "vote par procuration" (proxy vote says gg translate). It would be the same kind of voting. To answer Brooke concern: I also think the "you must register on the wiki" is not a big deal. If you want to be involved in Koha, registering on the wiki & bugzilla will be hard to avoid... -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08