Hie, I was thinking that some automated tools like for QA may need this consistency. But it's no big deal, there is actually no reason. I would also prefer '=>'. Best regards, Le 15/04/2014 20:15, Galen Charlton a écrit :
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com> wrote:
Glad to hear that either way works, but shouldn’t we aim for consistency? Should we not suggest a standard, even if we don’t enforce it?
-1 to making it a standard. I have a personal preference for '=>' over '=', but since TT accepts both forms, and I know of no user-visible reasons to prefer one over the other, adding it to the coding guidelines solely for the sake of consistency provides no real benefit.
I note that with the possible exception of PERL1, none of the current coding guidelines concern themselves solely with code styling consistency.
Regards,
Galen
-- Fridolin SOMERS Biblibre - Pôles support et système fridolin.somers@biblibre.com