Paul POULAIN <paul.poulain@free.fr> wrote:
I explain : unless i'm mistaken, it means : - kados is the RM - paul & chris are working on some feature - paul "commit" the feature to kados repository, who will accept it (or how is he warned that I made something ?) - chris update his copy from kados one.
Not necessarily. If kados permits it (this is a RM policy decision, I think), then you can accept your own commit into his release branch. As to how he's warned, that's the same sort of question as now: how is he warned about your CVS commits? CVS status screens, commit mails...
iiuc, a D-VCS is in fact a RM-VCS to my mind. Thus the question : do we have a RM that can afford that task/responsability ?
Paul probably knows more than most current developers: how much would it cost? From IRC, I think people see a more active review as a good idea, but we don't know whether we have enough resources. Regards, -- MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Webmaster/web developer, statistician, sysadmin, online shop maker, developer of koha, debian, gobo, gnustep, various mail and web s/w. Workers co-op @ Weston-super-Mare, Somerset http://www.ttllp.co.uk/