At 11:20 AM 4/11/2013 -0400, Kyle Hall wrote:
I think the biggest issue with just ditching the prog opac theme is everyone who upgrades will lose their customizations, and have to re-do them. However, if the prog theme has a specific sunset release, it will give everyone time to re-customize and hopefully patch the theme for any customizations that currently work on prog but not on ccsr due to lack of id's or classes.
Is it a good guess that just about every library (including CSSR) has their *own* customization of the OPAC interface? And that they all started with "prog"? If so, why ditch the common denominator? Not having 3.10 installed here, is there a "write up" on what the differences are? I've tried searching for 'cssr' on the bugs page but can only find snippets, and elsewhere have found: <jcamins at cpbibliography.com> wrote:
Administration > System Preferences > OPAC > opacthemes > ccsr Is ccsr supposed to be default in 3.10? No. The default remains prog. ccsr is an alternative for those who want it.
Plus some references to mobile apps. I had a look at https://sherbrooke.koha.ccsr.qc.ca/ but obviously that doesn't show what the underlying changes are. So I'm looking for pointers, please? tnx and br - Paul
http://www.kylehall.info ByWater Solutions ( http://bywatersolutions.com ) Meadville Public Library ( http://www.meadvillelibrary.org ) Crawford County Federated Library System ( http://www.ccfls.org ) Mill Run Technology Solutions ( http://millruntech.com )
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org> wrote: Is there anyone who disagrees that we should merge the two themes and have only one in the future?
Is the CCSR theme design the one every one likes better?
If not, what features of each should be preferred?
-- Owen
-- Web Developer Athens County Public Libraries http://www.myacpl.org