20 Feb
2007
20 Feb
'07
2:09 a.m.
Joshua M. Ferraro wrote:
Hi all,
In rel_2_2, every framework can have holdings fields, and this can lead to confusion when there are conflicts. I propose that in rel_3_0 we eliminate that confusion and only have holdings fields for the default framework. Any objections to this?
Hi Joshua Not sure I follow you here. So would it work this way, you enter your bibliographic information using your framework, then for the holdings information it flicks to the default framework? Chris