hie, Your framework is correct. In UNIMARC the most used fields for local numbers are 001 and 090$a (090$9 may be used also). It is the warning who is wrong. Le 08/11/2013 00:01, Andrea Furin a écrit :
hi. I had a very big problem: I cannot solve this: in "MARC bibliographic framework test" I have an error: "biblio and biblionumber The biblio.biblionumber and biblioitems.biblioitemnumber fields be mapped to a MARC subfield"
Installed Koha 3.12.6 via deb.
I use Unimarc.
My records.abs tells: ############ IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS ################## melm 001 Local-number,Local-number:n # Local-number (biblionumber can be either in 090$9 or, on some setup, on 001) melm 009 Identifier-standard:w,Identifier-standard:n melm 090$a Local-number,Local-number:n melm 099$c date-entered-on-file:s,date-entered-on-file:n,date-entered-on-file:y,Date-of-acquisition,Date-of-acquisition:d,Dat$ melm 099$d Date/time-last-modified:s,Date/time-last-modified:n,Date/time-last-modified:y melm 099$t ccode:w
My framework: biblio.biblionumber -> 001_@ bilioitems.biblioitemnumber -> 090_a
Please help, thanks in advance
a.f. _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
-- Fridolin SOMERS Biblibre - Pôle support fridolin.somers@biblibre.com