Hi koha-devel, On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:15:50 +0100 Paul POULAIN <paul.poulain@free.fr> wrote:
In rel_2_2, kados, hdl and other commited a lot of changes. There is still no changes in the DB, but I think we should call this version 2.4.0
Concerning CVS, how to do you plan to manage branches and releases? Will you create a new branch rel_2_4 and a release R_2_4_0 on it? Or will you prefer creating a release R_2_4_0 on branch rel_2_2? The former would be cleaner, since we would be able to continue bug fixing on rel_2_2. In my opinion, having a release 2.4.0 on a branch 2.2 is very confusing :-/ Maybe only "rel_2_2" CVS branch name is inappropriate, but we can't change it (CVS can't rename existing branchs). Cheers, -- Pierrick LE GALL INEO media system