On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Galen Charlton <galen.charlton@liblime.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz> wrote:
I guess the next question is who is doing the release Maintainers role, for 3.0? The last time there was discussion on this on irc (on the 7/7/2008). Biblibre offered to fill the role. Does that offer still stand? If so, here's one vote for them to take up that role, with Galen release manager for 3.1 (which will become 3.2 when its stable).
As far as I know, the following people or groups have expressed willingness to maintain 3.0:
- Josh, per the customary transition from 3.0 release manager. - BibLibre, in (I assume) the person of Paul or Henri-Damien.
LibLime would support either option. If Josh does it, he will have plenty of time to devote to it, as he will no longer have the full release manager responsibilities and is also looking to hand over the translation manager's portfolio to somebody else. If I remember correctly, Henri has also expressed willingness to be the QA manager for 3.2. Because of the potential workload, if BibLibre were to also take up 3.0 RMaint, I'd ask to them to confirm whether they're willing to do both, giving proper attention to each. If not, then either the 3.0 RMaint should default to Josh or we should put out another call for 3.2 QA.
Hi Not answering for Biblibre, as Im sure they will reply themselves, but Biblibre is more than one person, so even if they were wanting to do QA for 3.2 (which im not sure they do), its unlikely it would be the same person. Just as for liblime it wouldn't be the same person. So I guess im saying the same question applies to both. Personally I'd like to see the roles spread around as many organisations as possible. Just my 2 cents Chris _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel