Le 12/05/2011 17:26, Chris Nighswonger a écrit :
We are currently accepting patches into QA which are signed off by employees of the same company as the author of the patch.
So I'm a bit confused as to why Biblibre cannot adopt a similar procedure in order to get their patches into QA? I'm not only speaking of patches fixing a bug, but also of large updates adding a feature. Chris has said he wouldn't accept such a patch/branch self-signed. Perhaps if the issue is moving patches representing larger/more complicated features through QA, the submitter could provide references to installations/clients currently running the feature(s). The QA manager could then contact the supplied reference to verify QA and push the patch on up the chain. mmm... That would be fun to see one of our -French speaking- library answering a mail in English ;-) I don't think it's a possible way to go.
-- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08