Hi, On 01/09/2012 10:55 AM, Ian Walls wrote:
I support 942$f for the following reasons:
1. best to use an existing tag, and 942 is the best-fit candidate for non-repeating biblio-level, Koha-specific information
2. New subfields for new content, rather than repurposing an old field (and possibly having data conflicts on systems that still have the old, obsolete value)
3. subfield letter is the initial (in English) for the thing being stored; easy to remember!
+1 Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton Director of Support and Implementation Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts email: gmc@esilibrary.com direct: +1 770-709-5581 cell: +1 404-984-4366 skype: gmcharlt web: http://www.esilibrary.com/ Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org & http://evergreen-ils.org