15 Mar
2007
15 Mar
'07
7:37 p.m.
thinking of it, I was wondering wether a distributed VCS should be considered as a "Release Manager" oriented VCS. I explain : unless i'm mistaken, it means : - kados is the RM - paul & chris are working on some feature - paul "commit" the feature to kados repository, who will accept it (or how is he warned that I made something ?) - chris update his copy from kados one. iiuc, a D-VCS is in fact a RM-VCS to my mind. Thus the question : do we have a RM that can afford that task/responsability ? Once again, I may be mistaken, but i'm a little bit less enthusiasm if i'm right... -- Paul POULAIN et Henri Damien LAURENT Consultants indépendants en logiciels libres et bibliothéconomie (http://www.koha-fr.org) Tel : 04 91 31 45 19